Just something that's cropped up lately and luckily only seems to be on one of my own SEPM's and not a customer's, is that the Symantec Endpoint Protection Manager service keeps stopping. The 2008 R2 event logs are pretty straightforward on what's happening. So the scenario is that I reboot the server to get a clean start, and the service tries to start, then immediately stops. Here's the event log text, note the mention of Java Virtual Machine in STEP 2.:
STEP 1: Service starts
Log Name: Application
Source: semsrv
Date: 9/22/2014 9:29:53 AM
Event ID: 4
Task Category: None
Level: Information
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: COMPUTER
Description:
Symantec Endpoint Protect Manager is starting in response to a 'start' request from the Service Control Manager. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
STEP 2: Service errors out:
Log Name: Application
Source: semsrv
Date: 9/22/2014 9:30:18 AM
Event ID: 4096
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: COMPUTER
Description:
The Java Virtual Machine has exited with a code of -1, the service is being stopped.
STEP 3: service intentionally stopped during error process
Log Name: Application
Source: semsrv
Date: 9/22/2014 9:30:18 AM
Event ID: 5
Task Category: None
Level: Information
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: COMPUTER
Description:
Symantec Endpoint Protect Manager is terminating in response to a 'stop' request from the Service Control Manager. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
This SEPM is currently at the latest Java with update 67. I reinstalled Java (overlay install), no change to this problem. This issue has been off and on on various internal test SEPM'S for a very long time though, so I am not inclined to accept that it is purely because for example this update is too new or something, although that may still be the current explanation.
But I do recall seeing some kind of article once in the past that said that a newer release fo Java was not supported and that caused issues with SEPM...could it just be that SEP team hasn't really addressed that problem since it first began?
Thanks for any input or help.